Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Fraud Detection in Changing Financial Environments
Keywords:
reinforcement learning; fraud detection; financial systems; adaptive governance; machine learning infrastructure; fairness; operational resilience; policyAbstract
Financial fraud detection is increasingly confronted with environments that change faster than conventional supervised models can be retrained, governed, and operationally trusted. This paper examines reinforcement learning as an adaptive decision architecture for fraud detection in shifting financial ecosystems. Rather than treating fraud detection as a static classification task, the analysis positions it as a sequential socio-technical decision problem involving exploration, delayed feedback, adversarial adaptation, and institutional accountability. The paper discusses how reinforcement learning can support dynamic thresholding, transaction sequencing, alert triage, and multi-agent coordination across payment networks, banks, merchants, and regulators. It also analyzes structural trade-offs involving false positives, customer friction, enforcement capacity, explainability, fairness, and operational resilience. Particular attention is given to data infrastructure, streaming pipelines, feature governance, model monitoring, and deployment architectures that must sustain adaptive behavior without introducing uncontrolled instability. The paper further considers policy implications, including auditability, model risk management, consumer protection, and cross-border regulatory alignment. It argues that reinforcement learning is not a substitute for governance but a system-level capability that requires calibrated incentives, bounded autonomy, robust evaluation, and human oversight. Sustainable adoption depends on treating adaptation as an institutional process rather than a purely algorithmic one. The conclusion emphasizes that the value of reinforcement learning in financial fraud detection lies in its capacity to learn under uncertainty, but only when embedded within accountable infrastructure, fair decision rules, and resilient operating models.
References
1. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
2. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., Petersen, S., Beattie, C., Sadik, A., Antonoglou, I., King, H., Kumaran, D., Wierstra, D., Legg, S., & Hassabis, D. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14236
3. Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., Dieleman, S., Grewe, D., Nham, J., Kalchbrenner, N., Sutskever, I., Lillicrap, T., Leach, M., Kavukcuoglu, K., Graepel, T., & Hassabis, D. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961
4. Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2016). Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations. https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02971
5. Liu, T. (2026). Trust-Calibrated Multi-Agent Decision Intelligence for Financial Risk Management under Market Regime Shifts. Available at SSRN 7307503.
6. Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Statistical fraud detection: A review. Statistical Science, 17(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1042727940
7. Phua, C., Lee, V., Smith, K., & Gayler, R. (2010). A comprehensive survey of data mining-based fraud detection research. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.6119
8. Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011). The application of data mining techniques in financial fraud detection: A classification framework and an academic review of literature. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006
9. Dal Pozzolo, A., Caelen, O., Le Borgne, Y.-A., Waterschoot, S., & Bontempi, G. (2014). Learned lessons in credit card fraud detection from a practitioner perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4915–4928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.026
10. Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011). Data mining for credit card fraud: A comparative study. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008
11. Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. (2016). Fraud detection system: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 68, 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.012
12. Carcillo, F., Dal Pozzolo, A., Le Borgne, Y.-A., Caelen, O., Mazzer, Y., & Bontempi, G. (2018). SCARFF: A scalable framework for streaming credit card fraud detection with Spark. Information Fusion, 41, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.005
13. Zhang, Z., Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Wang, L., & Wang, P. (2018). A model based on convolutional neural network for online transaction fraud detection. Security and Communication Networks, 2018, 5680264. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5680264
14. Baesens, B., Van Vlasselaer, V., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Fraud analytics using descriptive, predictive, and social network techniques. Wiley.
15. Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015). Graph based anomaly detection and description: A survey. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 29(3), 626–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y
16. Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608
17. Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
18. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2023). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press.
19. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). COM/2021/206 final.
20. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. FSB.
21. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Principles for operational resilience. Bank for International Settlements.
22. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
23. Arulkumaran, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Brundage, M., & Bharath, A. A. (2017). A brief survey of deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2743240
24. Dulac-Arnold, G., Levine, N., Mankowitz, D. J., Li, J., Paduraru, C., Gowal, S., & Hester, T. (2021). Challenges of real-world reinforcement learning: Definitions, benchmarks and analysis. Machine Learning, 110(9), 2419–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-021-05961-4
25. Leike, J., Martic, M., Krakovna, V., Ortega, P. A., Everitt, T., Lefrancq, A., Orseau, L., & Legg, S. (2017). AI safety gridworlds. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09883
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Global Financial Analytics Research Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
