Federated Multi-Agent Learning for Privacy-Preserving Financial Risk Management

Authors

  • Irmtraut Bolzmann Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.
  • Espartaco Rosas Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Karan Zachariah School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Yadavi Bhakta Department of Computer Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Keywords:

federated learning, multi-agent systems, financial risk management, privacy preservation, governance, systemic risk, differential privacy, socio-technical systems

Abstract

Financial risk management increasingly depends on distributed data, heterogeneous models, and rapid coordination across institutions, yet the most valuable risk signals often remain trapped inside organizational boundaries because of privacy, competition, and regulatory constraints. This paper examines federated multi-agent learning as a system-level architecture for privacy-preserving financial risk management. Rather than treating privacy as a post hoc compliance layer, the discussion positions federated coordination, multi-agent decision intelligence, and distributed governance as interdependent design commitments. The paper analyzes architectural foundations, including client heterogeneity, communication efficiency, secure aggregation, and trust calibration across autonomous agents. It then considers privacy and security risks such as inference attacks, poisoning, model leakage, and adversarial coordination, arguing that differential privacy and secure computation must be paired with institutional accountability and continuous monitoring. Governance receives sustained attention because cross-border financial supervision, auditability, liability allocation, and fairness cannot be resolved through technical protocols alone. The paper also evaluates deployment constraints, socio-technical integration, systemic risk, scalability, and sustainability. It suggests that federated multi-agent learning can improve risk detection and resilience when it is embedded in layered infrastructures that combine technical safeguards, regulatory oversight, participatory governance, and human sensemaking. However, the same architecture can amplify opacity, herding, exclusion, and supervisory blind spots if incentives and accountability are misaligned. The conclusion proposes research and policy directions for robust, fair, and sustainable federated financial intelligence.

References

1. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 1273–1282). PMLR.

2. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D’Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., El Rouayheb, S., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., … Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

3. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.

4. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2019). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.

5. Bonawitz, K., Eichner, H., Grieskamp, W., Huba, D., Ingerman, A., Ivanov, V., Kiddon, C., Konečný, J., Mazzocchi, S., McMahan, H. B., Van Overveldt, T., Petrou, D., Ramage, D., & Roselander, J. (2019). Towards federated learning at scale: System design. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1, 374–388.

6. Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1310–1321). ACM.

7. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308–318). ACM.

8. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407.

9. Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.

10. Zhang, C., Xie, Y., Bai, H., Yu, B., Li, W., & Gao, Y. (2021). A survey on federated learning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 216, 106775.

11. Konečný, J., McMahan, H. B., Yu, F. X., Richtárik, P., Suresh, A. T., & Bacon, D. (2016). Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.05492.

12. Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A practical guide. Springer.

13. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507.

14. Liu, T. (2026). Trust-Calibrated Multi-Agent Decision Intelligence for Financial Risk Management under Market Regime Shifts. Available at SSRN 7307503.

15. Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

16. Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking.

17. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).

18. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services: Market developments and financial stability implications. Financial Stability Board.

19. Bank for International Settlements. (2018). Sound practices: Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors. Bank for International Settlements.

20. Lopez de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in financial machine learning. Wiley.

21. Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168.

22. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

23. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-08

How to Cite

Irmtraut Bolzmann, Espartaco Rosas, Karan Zachariah, & Yadavi Bhakta. (2026). Federated Multi-Agent Learning for Privacy-Preserving Financial Risk Management. Global Financial Analytics Research Review, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.gfarr.org/index.php/home/article/view/156