Sentiment Analysis of Financial News and Its Influence on Stock Market Behavior

Authors

  • Nathaniel Langford Department of Computer Science and Engineering Lehigh University
  • Theodore Ashcroft Department of Economics and Finance Oregon State University

Abstract

The integration of natural language processing and deep learning architectures into financial market ecosystems has transformed the velocity, scale, and nature of asset pricing and capital allocation. This paper examines the socio-technical architecture, systemic trade-offs, and structural governance challenges underlying automated financial news sentiment analysis and its subsequent impact on stock market behavior. Rather than viewing sentiment extraction merely as an algorithmic optimization problem, we contextualize it within large-scale data infrastructures, real-time deployment constraints, and policy frameworks. We trace how unstructured textual data flows from global journalistic networks through complex semantic pipelines to influence high-frequency and algorithmic trading engines. This transmission mechanism alters market microstructures, shifting liquidity patterns and compounding systemic volatility through feedback loops. Furthermore, the paper addresses the technical and ethical trade-offs inherent in model deployment, analyzing how the quest for latency optimization often compromises semantic robustness and introduces cognitive biases into market operations. We scrutinize the infrastructural dependencies of modern language models, emphasizing the sustainability costs, computational footprints, and data governance vulnerabilities associated with institutional-grade financial monitoring. Finally, we evaluate the regulatory and policy dimensions required to mitigate market manipulation, semantic monoculture, and algorithmic cascading failures. By synthesizing perspectives from computational linguistics, financial engineering, and macro-policy governance, we present a comprehensive framework for designing resilient, fair, and stable socio-technical market infrastructures capable of navigating the complex realities of automated sentiment-driven economies.

References

1.Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2-47.

2.Antweiler, W., & Frank, M. Z. (2004). Is all that talk just noise? The information content of internet stock message boards. The Journal of Finance, 59(3), 1259-1294.

3.Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 129-151.

4.Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1-8.

5.Boudoukh, J., Feldman, R., Kogan, S., & Richardson, M. (2019). Information, trading, and volatility: Evidence from financial news. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(3), 1112-1133.

6.Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 75-100.

7.Calomiris, C. W., & Mamaysky, G. (2019). How predicts notes? Forecasting economic and financial outcomes with text. Journal of Financial Economics, 132(3), 601-646.

8.Cartea, Á., & Jaimungal, S. (2014). Risk metrics and fine tuning of high-frequency trading strategies. Mathematical Finance, 24(3), 577-602.

9.Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4171-4186.

10.Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007.

11.Engle, R. F., & Manganelli, S. (2004). CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22(4), 367-381.

12.Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

13.Ghent, A. C., Torous, W. N., & Valkanov, R. (2021). Commercial real estate as an asset class: A survey. The Real Estate Economics Journal, 49(2), 312-345.

14.Hendershott, T., Jones, C. M., & Menkveld, A. J. (2011). Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 1-33.

15.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.

16.Kearney, C., & Liu, S. (2014). Textual sentiment in finance: A review of methods and models. International Review of Financial Analysis, 33, 171-185.

17.Kirilenko, A., Kyle, A. S., Samadi, M., & Tuzun, T. (2017). The Flash Crash: High-frequency trading in an electronic market. The Journal of Finance, 72(3), 967-998.

18.Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35-65.

19.Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in finance. The Journal of Finance, 71(3), 1185-1221.

20.Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59-82.

21.Menkveld, A. J. (2013). High-frequency trading and the new market structure. Economic Policy, 28(76), 701-744.

22.O'Hara, M. (2015). High frequency trading and market structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 118(2), 257-270.

23.Shorter, G., & Miller, R. S. (2014). High-frequency trading: Background, concerns, and regulatory developments. Congressional Research Service Report.

24.Shiller, R. J. (2017). Narrative economics. American Economic Review, 107(4), 967-1004.

25.Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139-1168.

26.Tetlock, P. C., Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Macskassy, S. (2008). More than words: Quantifying language to predict firm fundamentals. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1437-1467.

27.Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008.

28.Yadav, N., & Singh, S. (2020). Socio-technical system vulnerabilities in accelerated financial infrastructures. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 28(4), 512-529.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

Nathaniel Langford, & Theodore Ashcroft. (2026). Sentiment Analysis of Financial News and Its Influence on Stock Market Behavior. Global Financial Analytics Research Review, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.gfarr.org/index.php/home/article/view/101